Author: Cecep Mustafa

JHP Journal Editor’s NoteCecep Mustafa In the COVID-19 era, we witnessed one of the great paradoxes of our time. The physical world paused: cities fell silent, shops shuttered, economies stalled. Yet, at the same time, a digital pulse surged with astonishing life. Screens became marketplaces, data streams became lifelines, and financial technology—once hailed as a convenience—was suddenly a matter of survival. Indonesia’s experience between 2019 and 2022 provides a striking lens to examine this paradox. This essay reflects not on dry statistics alone, but on the human and socio-economic stories behind the numbers. It explores how two pillars of the…

JHP Journal Editor’s NoteCecep Mustafa In our modern world, few things feel as magical as a few taps on a smartphone to solve a pressing financial problem. A medical bill disappears. A school fee is paid. Rent is transferred. Relief is instant, almost cinematic. Yet, as with many conveniences, the very speed that delights can also conceal danger. Beneath the polished interface of a lending app lurks a new kind of predator: a digital loan shark. Its ledger is our contact list; its enforcement, calibrated with algorithmic precision. For millions of Indonesians, this is not a distant metaphor but lived…

JHP Journal Editor’s NoteCecep Mustafa 1. Indonesia’s Quiet Revolution Indonesia is witnessing a quiet revolution unfolding not in parliament halls or boardrooms, but in the palms of its people. Financial Technology—Fintech—has emerged as more than a tool of convenience; it is a moral and economic awakening. It redefines who gets to participate in prosperity. In a nation where millions have long been excluded from formal banking, Fintech is turning smartphones into instruments of inclusion—a digital lifeline for those once deemed invisible by the system. 2. Indonesia’s Unseen Engine Indonesia’s Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are not merely an economic…

JHP Journal Editor’s NoteCecep Mustafa Indonesia’s Fintech revolution has opened unprecedented access to credit and investment, expanding financial inclusion through Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending platforms. Yet beneath this progress lies a growing legal and ethical gap: platforms profit from risk without fully sharing in its consequences. For policymakers and the judiciary, the challenge is not merely regulation but the restoration of fairness in a rapidly digitizing economy. When technology entered Indonesia’s financial system, it arrived not through legislation but through apps—bright interfaces promising inclusion, convenience, and empowerment. With a few taps, a small entrepreneur could apply for a loan once impossible…

JHP Journal Editor’s NoteCecep Mustafa Ah, fintech — that glittering symbol of progress, the darling of digital optimism. We’ve been told it will democratize finance, bring credit to the unbanked, and make borrowing as easy as downloading an app. And, for a while, it did exactly that. By early 2020, over 25 million Indonesians were using peer-to-peer lending (FP2PL) platforms, supported by more than 160 registered companies. It felt like a new chapter in financial inclusion — speed, simplicity, and a promise to make the economy more human-centered. But then came the classic plot twist: regulation. The Regulator and the…

JHP Journal Editor’s NoteCecep Mustafa The story of Indonesia’s Judicial Commission (Komisi Yudisial, or KY) is, in many ways, a parable about the hopes and hazards of reform. Born from the turbulence of the post-1998 Reformasi era, it carried the weight of national disappointment on its shoulders—a disappointment in justice itself. At that time, trust in the judiciary was scraping the bottom of history’s barrel. A 2001 Kompas poll told a brutal truth: nearly three-quarters of Indonesians believed no legal institution in the country was fair. When faith in justice dies, societies don’t just become cynical—they become unstable. The KY…

By Cecep Mustafa In the great Kingdom of Justice, the Wise Rule-Makers were once trusted by everyone. They wrote the laws that kept peace in the land, and the people believed in their fairness. But one day, a shadow of doubt fell across the kingdom. A young boy named Adil began to hear whispers—rumors that the rules were not always fair anymore. The thought troubled him deeply, and soon others began to worry too. The good King noticed the unease spreading among his people. Wanting to restore trust and harmony, he created a new group called the Guardians of Fairness.…

The Hon. Justice Stephen Burley and The Hon. Justice Michael O’Bryan. Edited By Cecep Mustafa Di banyak ruang sidang, saksi ahli datang seperti prajurit bayaran — satu di tiap kubu, lengkap dengan data, teori, dan istilah teknis. Misi mereka jelas: mempertahankan posisi kliennya. Hasilnya? Pertempuran kecerdasan yang sering kali mengubur kebenaran di balik lapisan retorika dan kepentingan. Namun di Pengadilan Federal Australia, kisahnya berjalan berbeda. Bukan lagi duel, melainkan dialog. Bukan lagi pertunjukan, melainkan pencarian pemahaman. Di sini, pengadilan memperlakukan bukti ahli bukan sebagai arena adu kepintaran, melainkan sebagai perjalanan bersama mencari kebenaran — dan dengan itu, mereka mengubah budaya…

The Hon. Justice Stephen Burley and The Hon. Justice Michael O’Bryan. Edited By Cecep Mustafa Imagine a courtroom not as a battlefield of arguments but as a forum of ideas — where truth is not shouted but reasoned, and where science and law share the same bench. That, in essence, is the spirit of the Australian approach to expert evidence. In most courts, expert witnesses arrive like hired soldiers — one for each side — ready to defend their camp’s theory. The louder one often wins. But the Australian Federal Court chose a different path: instead of letting experts duel,…

Registrar Tim Luxton, edited by Cecep Mustafa Pustrajak Kita sering tergoda mengukur keberhasilan mediasi dari satu hal yang paling kasat mata: apakah para pihak akhirnya menandatangani kesepakatan. Padahal, kalau mau jujur, inti keberhasilan mediasi tidak terletak pada selembar kertas perjanjian, melainkan pada perjalanan batin dan rasionalitas yang tumbuh di ruang-ruang perundingan itu sendiri. Mediasi yang baik justru sering melahirkan kesadaran baru — tentang posisi, risiko, dan realitas perkara — yang tidak akan pernah ditemukan dalam dinginnya ruang sidang.Banyak pihak datang ke meja mediasi seperti prajurit yang siap perang, bukan pencari solusi. Mereka membawa dendam, ego, dan keyakinan bahwa hakim nanti…